Diversity Reading List update-a-thon
3 December 2020 5pm (CET) on Zoom.
The Diversity Reading List collects high quality texts in philosophy written by authors from under-represented groups. Its aim is to make it easier for us all to find such texts and use them in our teaching. This update-a-thon will make it an even better resource for creating inclusive syllabi in the philosophy of science.
Meet us on Zoom to chat, have a drink, brainstorm authors, and texts to add and divide the work of adding them. Please invite your friends (both to the event and the EPSA Women's Caucus Facebook Group). It's a trial, but we hope this will be fun, low effort, and high reward.
The Women’s Caucus organises a special guest lecture at the EPSA's biennial conference.
EPSA21: Catarina Dutilh Novaes
CONFIRMED FOR EPSA21! Title and Abstract: TBC
EPSA19: Heather Douglas
"Contours of Science and Justice"
What is the relationship between science and distributive justice? Science is a resource, a source of power for supporting decisions, for categorizing, and for revealing levers of action. As such, it is a matter of justice how this resource is distributed. The history of science over the past century reveals many ways in which the pursuit of science can be structurally unjust as well as ways it can be part of the pursuit of a more just society. I will describe aspects of science and justice in the access to science, the use of human subjects, the relationship with communities, and the shaping of the research agenda. This overview of some of the key aspects of science and justice will be used to show that the values that drive research agendas are not just an ethical matter, but also a political matter. Scientists, and philosophers of science, need to attend not just to ethical values in science but also to power, and how science can ameliorate past injustices and current inequalities.
EPSA17: Helen Beebee
"Women in Philosophy of Science: Where Are We, Where Do We Want to Be, and How Do We Get There?"
As everyone knows, women are hugely under-represented in professional philosophy in general, and in the philosophy of science in particular. (Is the situation worse in the philosophy of science? That’s a question I’ll address in the course of my talk.) How did this happen, and what can we do about it? In this talk, I present some data and some pertinent results from social psychology, and make some concrete suggestions for things all of us can do—often pretty small things—that might, if we’re lucky, make a difference.